What about a database? What about queues? Sessions? Background jobs? Scheduled jobs? Email notifications? File uploads?
So far, the answer to this solution has been: "Use 60 different libraries and services of varying quality and hope they play well together in your framework and hosting runtime."
Cloudflare as the "Supercloud"
Cloudflare's self-branded "Supercloud" is a great example of the results you can achieve by investing years of development into platform primitives.
They started out as a (free!) CDN with (free!) SSL. That got folks in the door.
Then they introduced KV Storage. Neat, and powerful—but still limited and not even close to a typical relational database solution.
Then came Durable Objects. R2 Storage. Scheduled Workers. Queues. Email.
D1 is the last missing primitive to take developing applications on Cloudflare to the next level.
Because so much of how we build web applications revolves around the data model of what we're building, it's critical that the database play a central role. We've seen success of Rails and Laravel for decades because of their powerful database abstractions, ActiveRecord and Eloquent.
I'm bullish on Cloudflare's future precisely because they've invested so heavily in these primitives. It may have taken a while to get here, and it may not have seemed like each piece would integrate with the other — but I think we'll see that it all fits together quite nicely.
Superflare is built with the following principles in mind:
Vendor Lock-in as a Feature
Superflare is built on top of Cloudflare's primitives. This means that you can't use Superflare without using Cloudflare. This can be a good thing.
Other solutions try their hardest to be vendor agnostic, both in the way they are designed and in the way they are distributed and deployed.
By leaning into the lock-in, we're suddenly blessed with a much simpler solution for many things:
- Need storage? R2.
- Need database? D1.
- Need queues? Queues.
- Realtime stuff? Durable Objects.
- Recurring things? Scheduled jobs.
The list goes on and on.
Constraints are good.
Not a Framework
Superflare is not a framework. It's a full-stack toolkit.
Plus, there are some really good solutions today:
- Next.js, especially the
/appdirectory with RSC
- Nuxt.js if you use Vue
- ...lots more
There are really smart people working on these solutions, and they're trying to build them really well. I'm not trying to do that — I'm trying to scratch my own itch and have fun.
So, Superflare's happy place is sitting on top of an existing framework as a "full-stack toolkit". It's the "glue" between Cloudlare and your framework of choice. You won't see Superflare dictate routing, controllers, or views. Just certain parts of the full-stack.
D1 and a new ORM
Having a solid data model is the foundation of any application. Superflare is built around D1, and it's the first thing you'll interact with when building an application.
While D1 is still in its early days (a public alpha at the time of writing), other ORMs exist for D1 already. However, none of them has made me feel excited about using D1.
Maybe it's a matter of personal taste, but I really enjoy the ActiveRecord-style interactions with my data models! Getting posts is as simple as
await Post.all(). No passing a database binding, no passing a JSON object of options, no passing a query builder.
This has its tradeoffs (see below), but I'm happy with it.
However, decorators are still experimental! Plus, they introduce additional syntax that can be confusing to newcomers (and even little ol' me).
Interface directly in the model file.
Again, there are tradeoffs, but:
No decorators in Superflare.
Superflare is built around the idea that authentication is a core part of any application. It's not an afterthought.
That's why we ship a
User class and a default
users table migration with each new Superflare template.
Your app is going to have a
User. You might as well embrace it.
I think Laravel gets this right. Because Laravel provides an opinionated authentication mechanism, it can provide several affordances to both internal and external applications that an agnostic framework wouldn't be able to.
On the other hand, Rails does not provide an authentication mechanism. You have to go hunting for some third-party gem whenever you want to add authentication to your app (which is usually right away).
Here's why you might not want to use Superflare:
I think this is pretty obvious.
Hey, Prisma exists and kinda dominates this space. Why would you want to learn a new ORM just to use Superflare?
I don't blame ya. Plus, the fact that Superflare has weird conventions around migrations and types. So, yeah.
Tension with Wrangler and Cloudflare's official roadmap
I don't work at Cloudflare, so I don't know for sure. But I bet their team is working on building a general "full-stack suite" that will aim to solve many of the same problems Superflare solves today.
This probably means that parts of Superflare will become obsolete. In which case, that's great!
It might also mean that parts of Superflare might stop working. That's unfortunate, but understandable.
Today, Superflare calls out to
npx wrangler for a lot of its functionality. This is because Wrangler doesn't provide an external API for running a development server, interacting with the Pages API, etc. This is a risky way to develop tooling, so you should probably know that.
I'm building this for fun
I'm building this project to have fun and not to be perfect. It's for my personal enjoyment.
You might not want to use it because of this, which is fine. Or do. I don't care. I'm not your dad. (Unless I am, in which case: Hi Kids! Get back to bed!)
Gosh, I took so much inspiration from other places for how I built Superflare: